By Alan Caruba
The Wednesday, June 10 Wall Street
Journal headline at the top of the page was “Obama Set to Expand Troops in
Iraq.” We were 589 days into the two
terms Barack Hussein Obama has served in the office of President of the United
States and he is as clueless now as he was when he arrived on January 20, 2009.
“President Barack Obama is poised to
send hundreds more American advisers to a new base in a strategic Iraqi region
to help devise a counterattack against marauding Islamic State militants, U.S.
officials said Tuesday, a shift that underscores American concern over recent
battlefield losses.” It’s 450
“trainers.”
We have had losses because (1) Obama
was elected on a promise to end the conflict in Iraq and (2) reelected by
pulling out troops to the point that the remaining Iraqi troops—Shiites in the
south—decided it wasn’t worth dying for their leaders. Can’t say I blame them,
but dying at the hands of ninth century Islamic fanatics is the fate that
threatens the entire Middle East, not just Iraq or what’s left of
it.
This is how we lost the war in
Vietnam. There was a time when Americans utterly destroyed their enemies on the
battlefield. In the latter half of the last century, starting in Korea, we
forgot how to do that and why that’s how wars are
won.
In all candor, like a lot of
Americans, I went back and forth about the Mideast conflicts. Looking back, I
think George H.W. Bush showed remarkable insight when, after driving Iraq’s
Saddam Hussein out of Kuwait, he stopped at the border and came home. George W.
had the notion he could somehow introduce democracy to the region. He couldn’t
and it will likely never really occur there because Islam is the only law and it
has kept the region ignorant, backward, and under the thumb of tyrants for
centuries.
The Islamic State troops must be
stopped at some point, but Obama is not the President who will do it. Whatever
U.S. backed combat occurs will be just enough to present enough television news
images to convince the gullible that progress is being
made.
Obama arrived in office without any
strategy and has spent the last six and a half years “muddling through” as the
British say. He and the Democratic Party had only one goal; to win the
elections. After that, they wanted to “fundamentally transform” the greatest
nation on planet Earth. They have largely made a mess out of everything they
touched from ObamaCare to Common Core.
There’s a reason why Obama will send
more troops and that’s because every one of our allies has told him that, if the
U.S. does not again assert its role of global leadership, they are not going to
cooperate with him in a thousand different ways.
Our allies in the Mideast have told
him they lack the military strength (and will) to conduct any kind of war with
ISIS. The U.S. and much of the rest of the world cannot afford to sit by and let
the enormous oil wealth and reserves of the Mideast come under the control of
ISIS.
So, once again we read headlines about
U.S. troops returning to the Mideast.
What that means is that the 2016
elections are more critical to the future of the nation than all previous
ones.
I think Americans, liberals,
conservatives and independents alike have had more than enough of President No
Strategy. I think there are enough older Americans who remember and take pride
in a nation that was unabashedly the world’s leader in the pursuit of peace and
democracy. And I think that the thirty percent or so of brain-dead liberals are
not sufficient to affect the outcome of a 2016 election devoted to restoring the
nation’s economy and leadership.
It can be done. John F. Kennedy was on
his way to doing so. Reagan did so. In 590 days from now, we can begin to do so
again.
© Alan Caruba, 2015
No comments:
Post a Comment