By Alan
Caruba
“The American people have spent 30
years and $15 billion to determine whether Yucca Mountain would be a safe
repository for our nation’s civilian and defense-related nuclear waste.” That’s
a quote of Sen. Jim Inhofe (R-OK) reported in the April issue of The Heartland
Institute’s Environment &
Climate News.
Compare that with the one year and 45
days it took to build the Empire State Building or the five years it took to
build the Hoover Dam in the depths of the Great Depression. In the first half of
the last century, Americans knew how to get things done, but the rise of
environmentalism in the latter half, starting around the 1970s, has increased
the cost and time of any construction anywhere in the U.S. In the case of Yucca
Mountain it has raised issues about nuclear waste that is currently stored is
less secure conditions.
As reported by CNS
News in January, “The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has released the
final two volumes of a five-volume safety report that concludes that Nevada’s Yucca
Mountain meets all of its technical and safety requirements for the disposal of
highly radioactive nuclear waste.” Five volumes!
So why the delay? The NRC says the Department of Energy “‘has
not met certain land and water rights requirements’ and that other environmental
and regulatory hurdles remain.”
A
Wall Street Journal editorial on March 30 asserted that It is not about
environmental and regulatory hurdles. It is about a deal that Nevada Senator
Harry Reid, the former Senate Majority Leader, cut with President Obama to keep
Yucca Mountain from ever opening for use. In return, Reid blocked nearly all
amendments to legislation to shield Obama from having to veto bills. He
virtually nullified the Senate as a functioning element of our
government.
“Since there is no permanent disposal
facility, spent fuel from the nation’s nuclear reactors—‘enough to fill a
football field 17 meters deep’ according to a 2012 Government Accountability
Office report—is currently being stored at dozens of above-ground sites. The GAO
expects the amount of radioactive waste to double to 140,000 by 2055 when all of
the currently operating nuclear reactors are
retired.”
The United States where the
development of nuclear fission and its use to generate electrical energy
occurred is now well behind other nations that have built nuclear facilities and
are adding new ones. As Donn
Dear, an energy expert with Power For USA, points out “there are only four
new nuclear power plants under construction, all by Toshiba-Westinghouse LLC.
One other plant, Watts Bar 2, whose construction was held up for several years,
is being completed by TVA.”
Meanwhile, as Dear notes, “South Korea
is building four nuclear reactors in the United Arab Emirates. The Russian
company, Rosatom, is building power plants in Turkey, Belarus, Vietnam, and
elsewhere. The China National Nuclear Corporation is scheduled to build over
twenty nuclear power plants.”
These represent jobs and orders for
equipment that are not occurring in the United States, along with the failure to
utilize nuclear energy to provide the growing need for electricity here. The
same environmental organizations opposing construction here are the same ones
supporting the Environmental Protection Agency’s attack on coal-fired electrical
plants. The irony is, of course, that nuclear plants do not produce carbon
dioxide emissions that the Greens blame for the non-existent “global warming”,
not called “climate change.”
A cynical and false propaganda
campaign has been waged against nuclear energy in the U.S., mostly notably with
the Hollywood film, “The China Syndrome” about a reactor meltdown. If you want
to worry about radiation, worry about the Sun. It is a major source. Three
incidents, Three Mile Island in 1979 and Chernobyl in 1986, added to the fears,
but no one was harmed by the Three Mile Island event and Chernobyl was an
avoidable accident.
More recent was the March 11, 2011
shutdown of the Fukushima reactor in Japan as the result of an earthquake and
subsequent tsunami. Three of its cores melted in the first three days, but there
have been no deaths or radiation sickness attributed to this event. That’s the
part you’re not told about.
In the end, all it takes is one
ignorant President to set progress back for decades. In this case it was
President Jimmy Carter for not allowing reprocessing of nuclear waste, a
standard practice in France where only one-fifth of spent fuel requires storage.
In the 1980s there were three U.S. corporations leading the way on the
introduction and use of nuclear energy to produce electrical power; General
Electric, Westinghouse Electric, and Babcock & Wilcox. Today only
Babcock-Wilcox continues as a fully owned American
company.
Thanks to President Obama, we have
lost another six years on the Yucca Mountain project. That fits with his refusal
to permit the Keystone XL pipeline. No energy project that might actually
benefit America will ever see his signature.
Some are arguing that America is a
nation in decline and they can surely point to the near destruction of our
nuclear energy industry as one example. That decline can begin to end in 2017
with the inauguration of a new President.
© Alan Caruba, 2015
1 comment:
i worked at Yucca Mtn in the mid - 80's. Nevada sure loved all that money and cushy jobs, but when it came time to step up to the plate....they tucked tail.
i know the real reason the greenies got the place shut-down....and it's not what you think.
Post a Comment