By Alan Caruba
Some say the world will end in fire,
Some say in ice.
From what I've tasted
of desire.
I hold with those who favor fire.
But if it had to perish twice, I think I know enough of hate.
To say that for destruction ice Is also great.
And would suffice.
I hold with those who favor fire.
But if it had to perish twice, I think I know enough of hate.
To say that for destruction ice Is also great.
And would suffice.
-- Robert Frost,
American poet.
Robert W. Felix
borrowed from the poet Robert Frost for the title of his book, “Not by Fire, But
by Ice”, first published in 1997 and devoted to the science of magnetic
reversals and the Earth’s ice ages. I read it first in 2010 and was absolutely
floored because Felix makes a very strong case for a reversal that would lead to
a widespread extinction of life at some point in the future. In the near, more
predictable future, he said the Earth was heading into a new ice
age.
“What would happen if
a magnetic reversal occurred right here?” asked Felix. “The same things that
happened in the past. Earthquakes, floods, volcanoes, giant snowstorms, rising
land, plummeting sea levels—you name it—tectonic activity would go bonkers.”
Don’t believe him? Think about the disappearance of the dinosaurs some 65.5
million years ago.
The Earth had been in
a cooling cycle that began in 1996 when the sun entered a cycle of reduced
radiation. Such cycles were well known and most dramatically tied to the
mini-ice age that occurred between 1300 and 1850. Solar observers had noticed
many centuries ago that when there were few sunspots—magnetic storms—on the
surface of the Sun, the Earth got colder.
This has become
especially dramatic because, on February 17 a post on http://thesiweather.com/category/climate-info/ called for a
discussion of the fact that “The Sun has gone quiet again during the weakest
solar cycle in more than a century.” The post says, “If history is a guide, it
is safe to say that weak solar activity for a prolonged period of time can have
a negative impact on global temperatures in the troposphere which is the
bottom-most layer of Earth’s atmosphere—and where we all
live.”
“There have been two
notable historical periods with decades-long episodes of low solar activity. The
first is known as the ‘Maunder Minimum’, named after solar astronomer Edward
Maunder, and it lasted from 1645 to 1715. The second one is referred to as the
‘Dalton Minimum’, named for the English meteorologist John Dalton and it lasted
from 1780 to 1830.” Together they are referred to as the “Little Ice
Age.”
There are quite a few
scientists forecasting a new ice age. The last ice age began approximately 1.6
million years ago in the Pleistocene epoch. We are currently in the Holocene
epoch that began about 11,000 years ago and is regarded as an interglacial
period of general warmth.
In his book, “Dark
Winter: How the Sun is Causing a 30-Year Cold Spell”, John L. Casey, a former White House
national space policy advisor, says that whatever warming has occurred has ended
as the result of “solar hibernation”, a term he applies to the reduction of
energy output of the Sun. The “climate change” that is occurring is a long-term
reduction in the Earth’s temperatures with, says Casey, “a high probability of
increased earthquakes and volcanic eruptions.”
In “Cold Sun”, another
book by Casey, his says that “The most likely outcome from this ‘solar
hibernation’ will be widespread global loss of life and social, economic, and
political disruption. You must prepare for this life-altering event
now!”
In January 2012, Matt
Ridley, a columnist for The Wall Street Journal, noted that “The entire
10,000-year history of civilization has happened in an unusually warm interlude
in the Earth’s recent history. Over the past million years, it has been as warm
as this or warmer for less than 10% of the time, during 11 brief episodes known
as interglacial periods.”
Those who kept warning
of a “global warming” with dire results misinterpreted the climate. Ridley noted
that “It’s striking that most inter-glacials begin with an abrupt warming, peak
sharply, (and) then begin a gradual descent into cooler conditions.” That is
what is occurring now.
None of this has
anything to do with carbon dioxide, ozone, or any other element of the Earth’s
atmosphere. It is entirely the result of the lower solar radiation of heat.
The United States
should be taking steps to ensure a sufficient supply of electricity to cope with
the lower temperatures, but has been wasting billions to support “renewable”
energy, wind and solar, that is costly and ineffective. The U.S. Energy
Department projects that solar power will make up 0.6 percent of total U.S.
electricity generation in 2015. Wind power which is funded in part by taxpayer
subsidies to stay in business has received $7.3 billion over the past seven
years, but produces a minimal amount of electricity to justify its cost.
At the same time, the
Environmental Protection Agency’s “war on coal” has forced many plants providing
electricity to close. A significant disruption of electricity over an extended
period of time will cause many deaths due to the cold weather. It is
inevitable.
At the same time,
instead of providing a source of food, tons of corn are being turned into
ethanol in the name of reducing carbon dioxide even though CO2 plays no role
whatever in a “global warming” that is not
happening.
It’s not just another
typical winter. The U.S. and much of the northern hemisphere is experiencing
increased cooling that is seen in record-breaking and record-setting new amounts
of snow and ice. This is a trend tied to the Sun’s and the Earth’s cooling
cycle.
That is of no concern
to those who are using “global warming” and “climate change” in order to bring
about a transformation in the global economic system from capitalism, the most
effective creator of growth and wealth, to socialism, a pathetic, failed system
of income redistribution controlled by a central government. Directed out of the
United Nations, their absurd claims are supported by the media and many deluded
politicians.
Is the U.S. government
responding in a sensible way? No. When President Obama speaks of “climate
change” he means “global warming.” The result over the past three decades has
been the waste of billions for “research” and other schemes tied to this huge
hoax.
Real climatologists,
meteorologists, and scientists paying attention to both the past and to present
events are forecasting more intense and longer winters—for now a Little Ice Age.
© Alan Caruba,
2015
No comments:
Post a Comment