By Alan
Caruba
Dateline: January 27, 2015 - 3 to 4
AM, New York City and Tri-State area.
There was no climate change where I
live in a suburb of Newark, N.J. if by “climate change” you meant a dramatic
blizzard with high winds and several feet of snow. It’s winter and you get the
occasional, rare blizzard every few years, but more often you get snowstorms.
That’s not “change” by any definition.
Listening to WABC radio follow events
with callers from around the Tri-State area calling in with far more accurate
reports than the meteorologists was an education in the way those trained in
meteorology and the rest of us have been conditioned to believe that something
is happening to planet Earth that, quite simply, is not
happening.
The meteorologists spent their time
trying to figure out the difference between a European computer model and one
generated here in the U.S. The former predicted far worse conditions. The latter
fell victim, along with the rest of us, to the mindset that the conditions the
computers were interpreting did not reflect what was actually happening.
At this early morning hour, it is
clear that Long Island, parts of Connecticut, and generally along the
coastlines, there has been a heavier snowfall. A few miles inland however it is
a far different story. Callers who had been out in the midst of the storm
described light, powdery snow and perhaps two to four inches at most.
Why, they asked, did the Governors of
New York and New Jersey, along with the Mayor of New York City close down the
metropolitan area? They speculated on the millions of lost income for everyone
involved in a storm that was not posing a significant traffic or other problems,
but who had seen businesses, schools, bus lines, and other public facilities
shut down. When a significantly incorrect weather prediction does that, it
demonstrates how important it is to correctly interpret the data being provided
by the satellites—the best source.
When, earlier in January, NOAA and
NASA reported that 2014 had been "the warmest year" it should have raised far
more questions and media coverage given the sheer absurdity of such a report.
Remember, though, these are two federal government agencies we expect to get it
right. They didn’t just get it wrong, skeptical scientists were quick to note
how they had deliberately distorted the data on which they based the
claim.
That is the heart of the issue
surrounding the endless claims of “global warming” or “climate change.” The planet has not been warming for 19 years
at this point because the sun has been in a perfectly natural cycle of low
radiation.
Centuries ago, it was noticed that
when there are few sunspots, magnetic storms, the Earth got colder. Thus,
“climate change” is not an unusual event, but rather a reflection of the
well-known cycles of warmth or cold that the planet has passed through for
billions of years.
At this writing it is too early in the
morning hours to know what the rest of the East Coast looks like, but the
indications are that, as one moves westward the “blizzard” has been far less
than the one predicted and will likely be downgraded to a standard winter
snowstorm.
That’s the good news. The bad news was
the over-reaction of meteorologists and politicians. No doubt they wanted to be
“safe than sorry” but they inadvertently taught us all a lesson about the way
environmental organizations and a government led by a President telling us that
“climate change” is the most dangerous challenge facing us have been
deliberately lying about the true meteorological record in order to drag us all
back to a time in which we burned wood for heat and rode horses for
transportation.
The Greens don’t like humans much and
that is why they have been lying about “man-made” climate change when the
climate has nothing to do with human activities.
Listen to the skeptics, often
maliciously called “deniers”, when they tell you the truth about the
meteorological science that has been deliberately distorted since the United
Nations established the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change in 1988. It
has been lying to us ever since.
Depending on where you live in the
area in which the snow fell and the winds blew, trust your eyes. Trust your
commonsense. Be more skeptical because the blizzard that wasn’t is not a lesson
you want to forget anytime soon.
© Alan Caruba, 2015
1 comment:
Climate scientists will predictably claim that meteorlogical models no longer work because of climate change.
Post a Comment