By Alan Caruba
When you get right down to it, the
protests said to be about the shooting of Michael Brown are really about how
differently the black and white communities view the police. Blacks may want
and need protection, but they don’t have the level of confidence in the police
that whites express.
That protection occasionally includes
having to shoot those who threaten the lives of police officers. If the Ferguson
and other city protests are against that they are as irrational as the burning
down of the Brown family’s church.
What we are witnessing is a rejection
of the rule of law and those who put their lives on the line to protect
society.
The President got involved,
predictably urging that violence be avoided, but also saying that the protesters
should “stay the course.”
Here is an excerpt from
The
New York Times:
“Some of the national
leaders met with President Obama on Nov. 5 for a gathering that included a
conversation about Ferguson.
According to the Rev. Al
Sharpton, who has appeared frequently in St. Louis with the Brown family and
delivered a speech at Mr. Brown’s funeral, Mr. Obama “was concerned about
Ferguson staying on course in terms of pursuing what it was that he knew we were
advocating. He said he hopes that we’re doing all we can to keep
peace.”
Protest leaders said
wholesale change was ultimately what they were demanding, though not all agreed
on what that meant. Some called for the removal of the Ferguson police chief or
the entire department. Others said they want the police to wear cameras;
civilian review boards for all police shootings; or a requirement that ethnic
and racial makeup of police departments match the communities they
serve.
“It must be changing how police and citizens relate to
one another,” said Michael T. McPhearson, the co-chairman of the Don’t Shoot
Coalition. “We’re calling for police accountability, police transparency,
changing how the police do their work. If there’s an indictment or if there’s
not an indictment, we still have that work to do.”
As reported by the Times,
according to the black community leaders the problem was the police, not the
community. In an appalling lack of judgment and prudence, The
New York Times published the name of the street on which Officer Wilson
lives! A Twitter user published what he claimed was the address and a photo
of his home.
As far as the media was
concerned the story was about police officer Wilson, not Michael Brown or the
protesters, except insofar as they provided dramatic video. The story became a
repeat of charges against police of “racial profiling” and other actions
resulting from just doing their job.
As we know, lots of the
violence took the form of looting and destruction of Ferguson businesses
occurring before and since the grand jury decision. What has surprised many
observers was the way neither the Missouri National Guard, called out by the
Governor, nor other police authorities engaged the “protester’s” criminal
behavior, arresting few while concentrating on protecting the court house and
police headquarters.
One of the dramatic forms of
protest was to burn police cars.
I recall an event involving
President Obama and a police officer when, on July 16, 2009, Harvard University
professor Henry Louis Gates, Jr., an African-American, was arrested at his
Cambridge, Massachusetts home by a local police officer responding to a 911
caller’s report that men were breaking into and entering the residence. As the
facts came out, professor Gates had returned home from a trip to China and found
the front door jammed shut. With the help of his driver, they tried to force it
open. When the police officer, James Crowley, showed up responding that what
well could be a crime in progress, Gates was less than cooperative and charged
with disorderly conduct.
The charges were dropped, but
the event invoked a national debate about “racial profiling” by police. On July
22, President Obama commented on the incident, criticizing the arrest and
Officer Crowley’s actions. The national response was a massive rejection of the
President’s comment and, two days later, a photo op was staged at the White
House where both Officer Crowley and professor Gates were seen with the
President enjoying a beer together. Indeed, it became known as the “Beer
Summit”; all because of Obama’s assumption that racial profiling, not the actual
facts of the event, was the reason Gates was charged.
Who doesn’t like the police?
People who tend to get questioned by them and who get arrested by them. Many of
those people are black because a significant amount of crime in America is
perpetrated by blacks and a significant percentage of those incarcerated in our
prisons are black. Who have been their victims? As often as not, other blacks.
As John Lott, president of the
Crime Prevention Research Center, noted in a Daily
Caller.com commentary, “The average black person is 6.5 times more likely to
be murdered than the average white person. Over nine out of every ten black
people who were murdered were murdered by other black people.” And many were
young men like Michael Brown. The slaughter in cities like Chicago, Detroit, and
St. Louis is commonplace and appalling.
As the facts of the Brown
shooting came out most whites concluded that Brown was a thug and, indeed, a
large one at six feet, four inches and weighing in at over 300 pounds. The
“gentle giant” was caught on video threatening a store employee after stealing
some cigarillos. Even though he was “unarmed”, a fact repeated in every story,
the grand jury concluded that he had attacked Officer Wilson who then had
acted in self-defense.
I do not want to appear
to condemn “all” blacks because to do so would be idiotic. The criticism here is
directed at cultural values that are well established and documented, but that
does not mean that “all” blacks share them. Many have achieved success since the
days of the civil rights movement and one can only hope that many more blacks
will join them, be lifted out of poverty and freed from poorly performing
schools. One can hope the same for others as well.
In cities and towns where
blacks are a significant part of the population they are likely to need more
police protection than whites. And many of the police who provide that
protection are white. I guarantee you that the next time a black person feels
threatened and calls the police they are not going to ask what race the officer
is.
© Alan Caruba, 2014
2 comments:
You might want to take another look at the "investigation" and the grand jury process:
http://williambscott.com/2014/11/ferguson-ii-cops-killed-credibility/
WaPo also documented the way the "investigation" was corrupted by "Law Enforcement" and the "Legal" system.
Officer Wilson may indeed have been the victim. But there's as good a chance that he deserves everything the Left is saying.
The reports I've read suggest the grand jury invested a great deal of time regarding the evidence about office Wilson. Claims otherwise are spectulation. Nothing so far indicates he did not act in a lawful fashion to defend himself.
Post a Comment