By Alan
Caruba
The news from Sydney, Australia was of
another incident in which a lone Islamic fascist took civilians hostage to
fulfill a demented notion of a “holy war” on non-believers. After a siege by
police two of the hostages he had taken were dead along with the gunman.
These attacks are becoming more
frequent, referred to as “lone wolf” events, but in a larger context, they
represent an effort by al Qaeda and the Islamic State, ISIS, to recruit
individuals to wage a war of terror everywhere.
Looking back over the year, in May
Mehdi Nemmouche who had returned to France after fighting for ISIS, entered the
Jewish museum in Brussels and killed four people. In October Martin Couture
Rouleau ran down two Canadian soldiers in Quebec, killing one of them. The same
month, Michael Zehaf-Bibeau killed a soldier at the Canadian parliament in
Ottawa. Also in October, Zale Thompson attacked four New York police officers
with an axe, injuring two in an incident that was deemed to be an Islamist
attack.
In the wake of these attacks police
everywhere are grappling with what they can do to anticipate and respond. In the
attacks that have occurred, the perpetrators were all known to law enforcement
authorities for their extremist views. In September, the Department of Homeland
Security and the FBI put out a joint intelligence bulletin that the Islamic
State has the capacity to mount attacks on U.S. targets overseas with little or
no warning. Presumably the warning also included domestic attacks as
well.
At a time when the threat is real and
growing, there are forces in America that have deliberately sought to undermine
public support and trust in the Central Intelligence Agency and National
Security Agency, both on the front line of defense against the Islamist menace.
The release of a report by Sen. Diane Feinstein (D-CA), Senate Intelligence
Committee chair, was widely denounced for its evident failure to interview those
named as engaging in “torture” to deter further attacks. This 20-20 hindsight
and reinterpretation of events is an offense on many
levels.
One has to ask why it is always
liberals who are unable to acknowledge an actual threat and defame those charged
with preventing them. It is as if they live in a parallel universe, a
make-believe world where our enemies do not
exist.
This is the mind-set that led the
President to remove our troops from Iraq, creating a vacuum that ISIS filled. He
is now lowering our role in Afghanistan and the news of the day is a barbaric
attack by the Taliban in Pakistan that has killed 130, mostly school children.
Can liberals grasp the barbarity of the Islamist enemies of our nation and the
whole of humanity?
Most serious, though, are the
negotiations with Iran, led by the Obama administration, that are sure to permit
a leading sponsor of terrorism to acquire its own nuclear
weapons.
This is why many cringed when the
anticipated Democratic Party candidate for President, Hillary Clinton, a former
Secretary of State, recently touted
an approach she calls
“smart power,” urging America to use “every possible tool and partner” to
advance peace. This, she said, includes “leaving no one on the sidelines,
showing respect even for one’s enemies, trying to understand and insofar as
psychologically possible, empathize with their perspective and point of
view.”
This
is the classic liberal excuse and attitude for not taking our enemies seriously
when they say they want to destroy America. There isn’t a single justification
for empathizing with people who want to kill you!
I frankly find the outcry against the
nation’s police corps curious and outrageous. In the Ferguson incident, it was a
case of self-defense that got Michael Brown killed. In Staten Island, it was the
unanticipated death of Erik Garner who had resisted arrest and had a long record
of similar offenses. The police did not set out to kill him, but a combination
of his ill health and the takedown triggered his
death.
The response of the communist Mayor of
New York, Bill de Blasio, was not to defend his police force, but to join in the
condemnation. Around the nation thousands marched, repeating the lies about
Brown’s innocence and the claims about Garner’s death. The marches, held in a
number of U.S. cities, were organized by groups with an agenda and it was aimed
at undermining public support and trust in our police corps.
Remember, too, liberals are also
opposed to the Second Amendment which empowers Americans to “keep and bear
arms.” There is no way to misinterpret or not understand the limit this puts on
government from the federal to the local level. Even so, the calls for such
limits are constant.
Reportedly, “according to the
Geneva-based Small Arms Survey – the leading source of international public
information about firearms – the U.S. has the best-armed civilian population in
the world, with an estimated 270 million total guns. That’s an average of 89
firearms for every 100 residents.” Liberals translate this as an invitation to
mass murder in the streets and homes of America, but the reality is that gun
ownership prevents criminal mayhem and protects lives. In states that permit
concealed carry, the crime rate is less than in those that do
not.
Liberals, though, would have you fear
your local police force and those agencies that are tasked with protecting the
nation, the CIA and the NSA. And, yes, the FBI too.
If not resisted, liberals would cause
us all to be killed by our nation’s very real foreign enemies and the domestic
perpetrators and criminals who prey on our society. Next time you see a police man or woman, take
a moment to tell them how much you appreciate their service.
© Alan Caruba, 2014
2 comments:
I find it amazing that the political left is willing to talk to and respect anyone or anything in this wide world other than those across the isle, a gun owner or in a womb.
I HAVE SAID HIS B4 when does the open season on Islam start.
Post a Comment