Israeli security fence on Egyptian border |
By Alan
Caruba
Let’s just say it up front and avoid
tip-toeing around with politically correct language. President Obama and his
administration are the most anti-Israel to have held office and likely the most
anti-Semitic. Forget about his public declarations of friendship and support for
Israel. For six years Obama has demonstrated his antipathy toward the only
democratic nation in the Middle East, the Jewish
state.
That’s why an anonymous administration
official felt free to call Israel’s Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, a
“chickenshit” and “a coward” while being interviewed by Jeffrey Goldberg for an
article in The Atlantic.
He or she had to know the comment
would go public. Netanyahu was accused of only being interested in his political
survival and afraid to launch an attack on Iran to slow or end its nuclear
armament program. In an effort to comply with U.S. demands, Netanyahu actually
had put himself at political risk at home. None of Obama’s demands were rewarded
or acknowledged and, for now, those days are over.
It is, of course, the Obama
administration that has led the most servile negotiations to date with Iran,
granting all manner of concessions in order to get an agreement that would put
that terror-sponsoring nation within three or four months of having a nuclear
warhead for its missiles or bomb for its aircraft.
Speaking to the Israeli Knesset,
Netanyahu responded to the insulting name-calling saying, “I am under attack
simply because I am defending the State of Israel. If I didn’t stand firm on our
national interests, I would not be under attack.” And then, typical of the
diplomatic dance, he said, “I respect and cherish the deep connection with the
United States.”
If he was speaking in an historic
context, he is right, but the six years of Obama’s terms in office have been a
succession of insults and demands that would make Israel vulnerable to the
constant presence of its enemies, Hamas in Gaza and Hezbollah in Lebanon, two
terror organizations that are proxies for their sponsor, Iran. During the recent
military operations to end months of continued rocketing from Gaza, the U.S.
repeatedly called on Israel to stop. When it was over, countless tunnels whose
sole purpose was for Palestinian terrorists to attack Israelis were
found.
Tunnels have also been a problem for
Egypt and they are the ones that run from the Sinai area into Gaza. Following
the Camp David Accords in 1979, Egypt and Israel signed a peace treaty. Until
then no Middle East Arab nation had any intention of acknowledging Israel’s
sovereignty. The treaty has held firm since then, but the new Egyptian
leadership came to power after the people demanded that the Muslim Brotherhood
be removed from office. It was; first by military coup and then by an election.
It is the same Muslim Brotherhood some of whose members have been part of the
Obama administration.
For Egypt, the Sinai has been the
scene of dozens of attacks against its military and security forces since the
ouster of former president Hosni Mubarak in February 2011 during the so-called
“Arab spring.” As Oren Kessler, the
Foundation for Defense of Democracies Deputy Director for Research, recently
noted, “Egypt has waged a sustained military campaign against Sinai extremists
since August 2012, including air strikes and ground operations, as well as the
destruction of at least 1,600 smuggling tunnels to the Hamas-run Gaza Strip.”
“Despite the fact that at least 20
attacks have targeted Israel since Mubarak’s ouster, the Jewish state has not
engaged in military operations in Egyptian territory” but “the recent Sinai
security challenges have prompted the Israelis and Egyptians to cooperate in
others ways…”
A response to its own security needs
led the Israelis to build a fortified fence along its Egyptian border, its
longest frontier, “in a bid to control the flow of asylum seekers and economic
migrants from Sub-Saharan Africa.” You
read that correctly, migrants want to live in Israel, perhaps knowing that, only
there, are those who are Christian will not be killed for their faith and those
who are Muslim will not be harassed. The fence, of course, has the added benefit
of addressing the threat of Sinai terrorism.
So, Egypt ranks high among
Israel’s allies in very real ways. The same can be said of Saudi Arabia, the
Muslim holy land where Mecca and Medina are located. As Bret Stephens, a Wall
Street Journal columnist, noted in late October, “The real problem for the
administration is that the Israelis—along with all the other disappointed
allies—are learning how little it pays to be on Barack Obama’s good
side.”
“Since coming to office in 2009,”
noted Stephens, “Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has agreed, against
his own inclination and over the objections of his political bases, to (1)
recognize the Palestinian state, (2) enforce an unprecedented 10-month
settlement freeze, (3) release scores of Palestinian prisoners held on murder
charges, (4) embark on an ill-starred effort to reach a final peace deal with
the Palestinians, (5) refrain from taking overt military steps against Iran, and
(6) agree to every possible cease-fire during the summer’s war with
Hamas.”
That, however, has not been enough for
the Obama administration. Not only did it hold up “the delivery of munitions at
the height of the Gaza war”, but Secretary of State John Kerry blamed Israel for
the failure to achieve peace with the Palestinians when history confirms their
long resistance and refusal to any peace deal. Kerry even managed to attribute
the rise of the Islamic State to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. That is
delusional and deeply offensive.
Largely unreported because the two
nations want it that way, Saudi Arabia and Israel have long been in discussions
of what to do if the U.S. sells out both
of them by concluding a deal with Iran regarding its nuclear arms program. Such
a deal would leave both nations and all others in the Middle East and beyond
vulnerable to Iran.
Saudi Arabia, the United Arab
Emirates, and other Sunni nations also have concerns about the rise of the Sunni
Islamic State. If Obama is indifferent to Israel’s security, he gives plenty of
evidence he feels the same about the Sunni nations.
If anyone, some years ago, had
predicted that two leading Muslim nations would find ample reason to ally with
Israel, they would likely have been laughed out of the room, but it is today’s
reality. It may make Obama angry, but the Israelis don’t care. Despite the usual
diplomatic charades, until Obama is out of office they and their Arab allies
will act to protect themselves as he continues to betray
them.
© Alan Caruba, 2014
1 comment:
Interesting analysis. However, your comments in the next-to-last paragraph are baffling. "The Sunni nations are concerned about the rise of the Sunni Islamic State". Then you say, "Both Iran and the Islamic State are Shiites". Poor proofreading, or even poorer logic?
Post a Comment