By Alan
Caruba
People really need to read the U.S.
Constitution. It says, “All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in
a Congress of the United States.”
The Constitution makes no reference
whatever to executive orders (EO). George Washington started the practice mostly
because he had to. Traditionally executive orders have been treated by Congress
as having the legal status of legislation, but only insofar as they apply to the
management of how the government operates.
The Constitution makes it quite clear
that the President has no power to enact laws, but as long as an EO does not
unilaterally alter or negate existing legislation or run counter to the
Constitution Congress usually accords it legitimacy. Those that do not honor the
separation of powers have been struck down by the courts or by legislation that
opposed them.
As is widely rumored and reported, if
President Obama does attempt to issue amnesty to illegal aliens he would be
over-riding or altering existing immigration law. He does not have the power to
do that.
Such an executive order would be
immediately challenged in the courts and if power in the Senate passes to the
Republicans in the midterm elections, Congress would oppose it. With an eye on
the 2016 elections, incumbent Democrats might not be willing to go along with an
Obama amnesty EO.
Recent polls all demonstrate
opposition to amnesty. In a September Investors Business Daily/TIPP poll 73% of
the public said that Obama should work with Congress on immigration reform.
After the invasion of an estimated 150,000 young people and others from
Guatemala and San Salvador earlier this year, comprehensive immigration reform
went from 54% approval last year to 48%.
When word leaked that the U.S.
Citizenship and Immigration Services agency had requested bids on a minimum of
four million blank work permits and green cards a year for the next five years,
there was an outcry in political and immigration policy circles. “There aren’t
enough federal employees from here to Pluto to do adequate background checks on
34 million,” said Bob Dane, spokesman for the Federation for American
Immigration Reform.
In September, the Census Bureau
released new data on the U.S. population finding that the nation’s immigrant
population (legal and illegal) hit a record 41.3 million in July 2013, an
increase of 1.4 million since July 2010. Since 2000, the immigrant population is
up 10.2 million and double the number in 1990, nearly triple the number in 1980,
and guadruple that in 1970, which it stood at 9.6
million.
It’s no secret President Obama has
wanted to get as many immigrants as possible, especially those from south of the
border, into America. He has winked at the laws that determine immigration and
citizenship. In 2011 many believed he had “enacted” the Dream Act by EO, but he
had not. His administration instead adopted a policy regarding the deportation
of illegal immigrants brought to the U.S. as children, granting them the option
of applying for two-year work permits. Even conservatives could find some merit
in this, allowing them to gain legal status and apply for
citizenship.
The amnesty issue would play havoc
prior to the November 4 midterm elections, so Obama will wait until after them
to announce his intentions. I doubt he thinks an executive order will go
unchallenged, but at that point it will not matter to him since he will not be
running for reelection in 2016. His indifference to constitutional restraints on
his power as President is well known.
On October 22 Iowa Rep. Steve King, a
Republican, predicted Obama will “violate the Constitution, break the law and
grant executive amnesty.”
“If the President takes this action,”
said Rep. King, “ (that) he’s threatened to take we will have abandoned every
pretext of the Constitution of the United States and if the American people take
that setting down or lying down, then our constitutional republic has been
destroyed.”
Rep. King is right, but the Obama EO
will be challenged in the courts and in Congress. If that effort is opposed by
Democrats in Congress, their midterm losses will barely rival what the 2016
election will hold for them.
© Alan Caruba, 2014
No comments:
Post a Comment