By Alan Caruba
Given all the mutations that the
Middle East has gone through thanks to the emergence of al Qaeda during the
resistance to the Soviet takeover of Afghanistan, watching what is occurring now
with an even more fanatical group calling itself the Islamic State (ISIS) and
proclaiming itself the new caliphate has proven even more lethal and more
feared.
The closest thing to a caliphate has
been the assertion of al Saud, the royal family that runs Saudi Arabia who has
long claimed to be the protector of Islam’s two most holy sites, Mecca and
Medina, and of the true form of its expression, the strict Wahhabi
interpretation. Were it not for its oil, the royals would have had to live off
the earnings from the hajj, the visit to Mecca that all Muslims are required to
make at least once in their lifetime.
The Saudis, despite having at least
250 U.S. and British advanced fighter aircraft, have typically avoided engaging
in combat; the type that will be required to destroy ISIS. Instead, it gave $100
million to the United Nations Counter-Terrorism Center, but the latest news is
that al Qaeda linked Syrian rebels from the Nusra Front battled U.N. military
peacekeepers encamped on the Golan Heights on August 30, forcing some to escape
to Israel. The UN’s peacekeeping role and its ability to deter wars are hardly
notable.
Royal Saudi Air Force |
Oil made the Middle East’s despots and
monarchs wealthy, but former despots have been removed in Egypt, Libya, and
Tunisia, while Syria’s has been engaged in what started as a civil war and
became a magnet for the group that broke away from al Qaeda, espousing an even
more fanatical interpretation of Islam.
Now Middle Eastern nations that have
been enemies, like Saudi Arabia and Iran—one Arab, the other Persian, one Sunni,
the other Shiite—have found themselves equally threatened.
This common enemy has caused other
relationships to alter. Turkey which has been in conflict with the Kurds
remained silent when Syrian Kurdish militias helped rescue the Yazidis who were
driven from their homes by ISIS. Al Qaeda’s Syrian component, the Nustra Front,
now finds itself at war with ISIS.
Even the Egyptians found themselves on
the same side of the Israeli battle with Hamas, destroying many of the tunnels
built from their nation into Gaza. They now both share a distrust of the United
States.
Indeed, the United States is virtually
without any friends left in the Middle East, at least at the level that
previously existed. This is entirely the result of Barack Obama’s astonishing
talent for picking the wrong side in events there.
His criticism of Israel defending
itself against thousands of rockets from Hamas in Gaza has eroded what
friendship existed after his criticism of its settlements and rude treatment of
its Prime Minister. The Egyptians were offended by his support for the Muslim
Brotherhood that took over after Mubarak was deposed. The Brotherhood was so
dictatorial and so awful a military coup was required to remove its leader and
it is now banned in Egypt.
Iraq is responsible for its own
problems, having put a Shiite fanatic in charge as its prime minister along with
its refusal to permit a contingent of American troops to remain. Now, unless the
new prime minister—the choice of both Saudi Arabia and Iran—can unify what’s
left of its government and work with the U.S. to destroy the Islamic State, Iraq
could cease to exist along with Syria.
Other players in the region include
the Gulf States of Qatar, a supporter of ISIS; Bahrain, and the United Arab
Emirates, Kuwait, and Oman. The UAE recently joined with Egypt to conduct air
strikes in Libya on armed Islamic terrorist groups there. Reports of the attacks
were sketchy at best. Libya has been in turmoil since Muammar Gadhafi, its
former dictator, was deposed in 2011.
The Islamic State has been able to do
what no previous entity ever had. It has united the many different nations in
the Middle East, each of which is responding in what it deems its own best
interest while studiously trying to avoid direct military engagement.
Persian Iran, however, has put troops
into Iraq to fight it. At some point
other Arab states will have to, but Saudi Arabia and all the others, Europe
included, continue to wait for the United States to
lead.
Barack Obama is the most
confrontation-adverse President to have ever held the office and the only one
who has ever had warm feelings for Islam. It took him eight days and three tries
to actually say he wanted to “destroy” ISIS.
Obama must surely be under intense
pressure because he has been increasing the bombings and the number of troops on
the ground in Iraq.
What Obama tells the nation regarding
plans to destroy the Islamic State is likely to fall far short of anything that
will achieve that goal. This is why he is already talking about how long it will
take. This is a job he wants to leave to the next
President.
© Alan Caruba, 2014
No comments:
Post a Comment