By Alan
Caruba
If I need my car repaired, I do not
take it to a dentist. If I am seeking advice about the climate I check out what
climatologists and meteorologists are saying, at least those who have not sold
their souls to the global warming/climate change
hoax.
On September 3 The Wall Street Journal
published a commentary by Edward
P. Lazear titled “The Climate Change Agenda Needs to Adapt to Reality:
Limiting carbon emissions won’t work. Better to begin adjusting to a warming
world.”
Wrong! Wrong! Wrong! It’s cooling, not
warming.
Apparently Mr. Lazear is unaware that
the Earth has been in a cooling cycle for
seventeen years. A visit to
www.climatedepot.com or a subscription
to the Heartland Institute’s monthly Climate &
Environmental News or a copy of its policy studies, “Climate
Change Reconsidered”, would help him understand why he’s wrong. Check out www.climatechangedispatch.com as
well for the latest commentaries.
Perhaps his error should be forgiven
because Mr. Lazear is an economist. He was the chairman of the President’s
Council of Economic Advisors (2006-09) and head of the White House Committee on
the Economics of Climate Change (2007-08). Presently he is a professor at
Stanford University’s Graduate School of Business and a Hoover Institution
fellow.
He’s not a fool, but like a lot of
academics who lack a background in science, he has been fooled by the legion of
global warming/climate change charlatans from Al Gore through the ranks of
organizations such as the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate
Change that depend on maintaining the hoax.
Mr. Lazear has fallen for the greatest
lie ever; the assertion that greenhouse gases, especially carbon dioxide, are
warming the Earth. The hoaxers are calling the past seventeen years “a pause” in
warming, but it is actually an indicator that the Earth is on the cusp of the
next ice age. The period in between ice ages is calculated at 11,500 years and
we are at the end of the current interglacial
period.
“The Obama administration is
instituting a variety of far-reaching policies to reduce carbon emissions and
mitigate climate change. Are any of these capable of making a difference”, asked
Mr. Lazear. “Simple arithmetic suggests not.” Up to this point I was very
pleased with his conclusion, but then he wrote “Given this reality, we would be
wise to consider strategies that complement and may be more effective than
mitigation—namely, adaptation.”
Humans have been adapting to the
climate—the weather—since they emerged as homo sapiens about 195,000 years ago.
What Mr. Lazear wants the U.S, to do
is limit “carbon emissions” but admits that “The economics also work against a
major transformation in the technology of producing power, either mobile or
stationary. Coal is cheap. Natural gas is becoming even cheaper.”
The primary flaw in his commentary is
simply that more carbon dioxide is a good thing. As the primary gas utilized by
all vegetation, more means greater crop yields and healthier forests. What
carbon dioxide doesn’t do is “trap” heat long enough to lower the Earth’s
temperature. It represents a mere 0.04% of the atmosphere.
The Earth is not a greenhouse with a
glass roof. The amount of heat in the atmosphere is totally dependent on the
amount of heat the Sun produces. In its current cycle, it is producing less.
“Carbon math,” wrote Mr. Lazear,
“makes clear that without major effort and a good bit of luck, we are unlikely
to control the growth of emissions enough to meet the standards that many
climate scientists suggest are necessary.” Those scientists are usually on
college or university faculties where securing federal and other grants to study
a warming that is not occurring leads to urging limits on carbon dioxide. Others
are just huge liars who, like Al Gore, have been making predictions of warming
that have not and are not coming true.
There’s another reason why there will
be more carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. It involves two of the most swiftly
developing nations in the world, China and India, both of whom are building
coal-fired plants to generate electricity as fast as they can. This is happening
while the Environmental Protection Agency has been engaged in an all-out war on
coal that has closed several hundred U.S. plants. If an especially cold winter
occurs, the demand for electricity to warm homes and other facilities may
overload a system that has been diminished in scope.
The United Nations Intergovernmental
Panel on Climate Change is the driving force behind the global warming hoax. It
is holding a climate change summit on September 23. Guess who won’t be
attending? Chinese president Xi Jinping, India’s prime minister, Narenda Modi,
and for good measure, Germany’s chancellor, Angela Merkel. Others whose leaders
will not be attending include Canada, Japan, and
Russia.
In typical fashion, always predicting
climate conditions decades from now, the United Nations, according to a report
in The Guardian, “is warning of floods, storms and searing heat from Arizona to
Zambia within four decades, as part of a series of imagined weather forecasts”
to publicize the climate summit.
All of the forecasts made by a legion
of climate charlatans in the 1980s and 1990s turned out to be
WRONG.
You cannot trust the UN’s World
Meteorological Organization which like the IPCC is just part of a vast matrix of
groups that have been so severely corrupted by the global warming/climate change
hoax that one must exercise caution when hearing its forecasts. If they are for
anything beyond two weeks hence, you would be wise to be dubious.
Mr. Lazear is just one of many, often
with distinguished careers in other
fields than meteorology or climatology, who have bought into the hoax and who
declaim the need to reduce carbon dioxide. He’s wrong. The others are wrong.
And you need to educate yourself to
avoid being afflicted by various government policies intended to advance the
hoax. To start with, do not vote for any politician who talks of global
warming/climate change or uses the term “sustainability.”
© Alan Caruba, 2014
No comments:
Post a Comment