By Alan
Caruba
“Today,
American pets now outnumber American children by more than four to
one.”
When a
nation’s population fails to reproduce and replace itself, it goes into decline.
That is the theme of Jonathan V. Last’s new book, “What to Expect When No One is
Expecting: America’s Coming Demographic Disaster.” Fertility rates may seem an
odd topic in the midst of anemic economic growth, raging debates about
entitlement programs, a government in gridlock, and threats from external
enemies, but they are critical the nation’s future.
“In
order for a country to maintain a steady population, it needs a fertility rate
of 2.1” but America’s rate “currently sits at 1.93.” Declining populations have
always followed or been followed by Very Bad Things. Disease. War.
Economic stagnation or collapse. And these grim tides from history may be our
future, since population is where most of the world is heading.”
Yes,
the world. It has all manner of implications, not just for the U.S., but for
nations like China and Russia where their leaders are urging their populations
to have more babies.
“Our
modern world has evolved in such a way as to subtly discourage childbearing.
It’s not a conspiracy. None of these changes was intended to drive down
fertility” which means “that there is something about modernity itself that
tends toward fewer children” no matter what nation or region of the world.
In the
U.S. one of the factors has been the legalization of abortion in 1973. Last
notes that “The widespread practice of abortion culled an entire generation’s
worth of babies that otherwise might have been born.” An entire generation! When
you add in the use of the contraceptive pill used by 17 percent of American
women aged 15 to 44, that’s 10.54 million women and they are predominantly
well-educated, middle-class white women who are in their prime reproductive
years. Since Roe v. Wade “more than 49.5 million babies have been aborted
in America.”
The
“pill” in addition to other factors has altered the behaviors that lead to
making babies; sex, dating, marriage, and births; not that women stopped having
babies. “By 2008, 40.6 percent of all births were to unmarried women.” That
alters a society—any society—in which marriage and family are essential
elements.
In the
United States the cost of having a child is prohibitive. “It is commonly said
that buying a house is the biggest purchase most Americans will ever make. Well,
having a baby is like buying six houses, all at once.” That tends to make
couples stop after having just one.
In
creating “entitlement” programs such as Social Security and Medicare the
politicians failed to anticipate both the falling number of new citizens born
and the rising number who are now living well beyond age 65 and requiring much
more eldercare costs. These two programs, says Last, “have placed a serious and
increasing burden on families, making it more difficult to afford the—also
increasing—cost of children.”
As more
and more Americans have aged, “By 2010, just 2.9 workers were paying for the
benefits of each retiree.” Currently they are receiving $546 billion in
benefits. Enrollment in Medicare by 2010 was 47.5 million “and each beneficiary
cost $9,828 for a total of $523 billion. In that year, Medicare spent $32.3
billion in benefits than it took in. Forty cents of every dollar the U.S. spends
involves Social Security and Medicare. Obamacare took $716 billion out of Medicare to
pay for the new program that expands Medicaid and will add millions more to its
rolls.
“Social
Security and Medicare were conceived in an era of high fertility. It was only
after our fertility rate collapsed that the economics of the programs became
dysfunctional.”
The
feminist movement encouraged more women to go to college and join the workforce.
“Simply put,” says Last, “the more educated a woman is, the fewer children she
will have in the course of her lifetime. Women are putting off childbearing
until later in life and Last notes that “By 35, a woman has a 15 percent chance
of being unable to conceive at all. And by a woman’s 45th birthday,
her chances of getting pregnant are nearly zero.” My maternal grandmother
married in her teens and had four daughters and one son by her mid-twenties. I
have a family photo that shows her with her children. She looks like an older
sister!
It is
true that the world’s population has hit new heights, but Last points out that
“Demographic momentum is a two-way street. Just as it causes population to grow
even after fertility rates have fallen below replacement, momentum eventually
causes population to contract, even if fertility rates increase.
“The
forces of demography,” says Last, “are pushing every nation on earth in the same
direction: fewer and fewer children.”
If by
now your eyes have glazed over and you need a stiff drink, consider that such
fertility rates exist no matter how our politicians struggle to deal with union
pension and healthcare benefits, and the programs created to provide “a safety
net” for Americans.
Add to
this populations migrating to where jobs exist or where wars cause them to flee
to safer places. Then there are nations with imbalances involving large numbers
of young men and not enough young women to marry. China now has 123 boys born
for every 100 girls. Last notes that, “a skewed sex ratio has often preceded
intense violence and instability.”
Now
compare this relentless arithmetic of demography against the absurd focus of
national leaders on the planet’s climate as if anything can be done to alter or
affect it.
© Alan
Caruba, 2013
2 comments:
In 1950 Americas population was 150 million, now its 330 million.
Wheres the problem?
Americans are not having enough babies. The rest of the world should lock on a chastity belt, throw away the key, and sit back in front of the Idiot Box to let their unemployed and essentially vestigial brains finish rotting.
Post a Comment