By Alan
Caruba
If you
take a look at the map of the Middle East and read the daily headlines, you have
to wonder what it must be like to be an Israeli—a nation the size of New
Jersey—surrounded by Arabs driven insane by Islam, by a succession of brutal
dictators, and by the never-ending hate-filled fulminations in the mosques and
media against Zionism, Israel, and Jews.
The UN
nuclear watchdog released a report last week stating that Iran has installed
advanced technology at Natanz, its main site for uranium enhancement. Iran that
has relentlessly sought to make its own nuclear weapons and the missiles with
which to deliver them. In 2009, Dore Gold, Israel’s former ambassador to the
United Nations—a hotbed of anti-Zionism—and the president of the Jerusalem
Center for Public Affairs, authored “The Rise of Nuclear Iran: How Iran Defies
the West.”
“It can
be reasonably asserted that Iran perceives itself as a natural hegemonic power
in its region,” wrote Dore. With roughly one-tenth of the world’s supply of oil
and natural gas, Iran had the financial capacity to acquire the military
strength it needed to realize its historical ambitions.” The various sanctions
that have been applied to it have wreaked havoc on its economy, but have no
deterred its intentions.
“Given
that the Islamic Republic was the first to systematically employ suicide bombing
attacks in the present era, it could very well be immune to deterrence and the
threat of full scale retaliation should it employ nuclear weapons,” wrote
Dore.
Writing
more recently in The Washington Times, columnist Jeffrey T. Kuhner, addressed
the “Consequences of a Nuclear Iran.” He reiterated the history of President
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s many threats to Israel and its denial of the Holocaust,
the deliberate murder of six million of Europe’s Jews during World War II. “What
if Mr. Ahmadinejad is not lying” about Iran already being a nuclear power?”
asked Kuhner. “Then the West—and especially the United States—faces a major
crisis. It means the West’s policies of sanctions and diplomatic engagement have
failed.”
It
means that President Obama’s efforts, as executed by former Secretary of State
Hillary Clinton, throughout his first term have failed. It does not bode well
that the new Secretary of State, John Kerry, in his first major foreign policy
speech on February 20, believes that the real threat is climate change, not Iran
and the other known enemies of the nation.
Kerry
is delusional. He blathered on about “an environment not ravaged by rising seas,
deadly superstorms, devastating droughts, and other hallmarks of a dramatically
changing climate.” The seas are not dramatically rising, large storms have
occurred throughout our history, as have droughts. It is as if Iran, the Middle
East, Africa, North Korea, China and Russia aren’t even a
problem.
The
designate for Secretary of Defense, Chuck Hagel, is, if it is possible, an even
worse choice so far as Israel is concerned. He is on record repeatedly
displaying his antipathy—and worse—towards Israel. Demonstrably incompetent for
the job, Hagel will reflect Obama’s reluctance for any combat short of the
antiseptic use of drones.
The
President has repeatedly stated that he will not accept a nuclear-armed Iran,
but the President has spent years saying things that turned out to be empty
promises and outright lies. His ties to anti-Semites and stated sympathy for
Islam make anything he says suspect.
Kuhner
warned that “An attack (on Iran) would have disastrous consequences. Iran is not
Iraq. It is a much larger and more populous nation. It has proxies across the
region—including Hezbollah, Hamas, and Syria’s besieged regime.”
The
Israelis know this in ways we never can. It recently had to take military action
against Hamas in Gaza to slow the continued rocketing of his towns in its south.
It has fought numerous ways since its founding in 1948, and it is threatened on
all of its borders with Lebanon, Syria, the Palestinian enclaves in the West
Bank and Gaza.
The
change of power with Egypt, now in the hands of the Muslim Brotherhood, poses a
threat to its peace treaty with Egypt. The civil war that has been raging in
Syria for two years poses a present and future threat on its border. Jordan,
which has been a stable monarchy and friend, is being challenged by Islamists.
The
President is scheduled to visit Israel in March, the first visit since having
been elected in 2008. His relations with Israeli Premier Benyamin Netanyahu are
chilly at best. Everything he says—and does not say—will be examined. The U.S.
has provided a lot of military aid to Israel, but one wonders if that isn’t part
of a larger policy to maintain a balance of power in the region.
The
Israelis have been a major source of intelligence to the U.S. Even so, one
suspects that the Israelis have deep reservations about President Obama and a
lack of confidence given his past statements about its borders and settlements.
The
U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan and Iraq says everything you need to know about
the failure of its military involvement in both nations and its failed effort at
“nation building.” When you add in the U.S. reduction of naval power in the
Persian Gulf, you might imagine that the current Iranian regime believes it is
triumphing over “the Great Satan” as it pursues its quest to “wipe Israel off
the map.”
Dore
stated a fundamental truth that continues to be ignored by the Obama regime. “If
the West has a choice between negotiating yet again with the regime in Iran or
undercutting it further, it should clearly seek to promote a process that leads
to its collapse and replacement. Engagement was tried in the past and doesn’t
work.”
Meanwhile, our new Secretary of State
is wedded to negotiations and to the notion that climate change is the real
threat to the West.
© Alan
Caruba, 2013
No comments:
Post a Comment