By Alan Caruba
In late
2010 I let my subscription to The Economist expire and now I am going to do that
for Bloomberg Business Week.
In the
February 18-24 edition of Business Week, an editorial, “The Right Way Forward on
Climate Change”, contained this gem: “Still, the U.S. accounts for about 19
percent of all emissions—emissions that are causing global temperature
increases, rising seas, and destructive droughts, floods, and hurricanes,
according to a government advisory panel report released last
month.”
When a magazine publishes such
drivel, you should not read it. There are no rising temperatures worldwide.
There is, in fact, a colder world that reflects a cooling cycle that began
around sixteen years ago. Glaciers are growing. Snow is falling in increasing
amounts and in places one usually does not associate with snow like Arizona. The
seas are not rising. Polar bears are not going extinct. Et
cetera.
To not
know such simple facts betrays either an appalling ignorance or an appalling
agenda, the advancement of the global warming—now called climate change—hoax.
The
February 25-March 3 edition had an editorial on why the Keystone XL pipeline
should be approved. It began “Americans concerned about pollution and climate
change have traditionally stood with science, in particular the consensus that
greenhouse gas emissions from human activity are warming the earth and changing
the climate.” There is so much wrong with this short sentence one hardly knows
where to start.
First
of all, “climate change” is what the climate has been doing for 4.5 billion
years on planet Earth. There have been a number of ice ages which properly can
be called climate change . When the last one ended around 11,000 years ago, we
entered the Holocene.
Pay
attention now to this description of the Holocene: “Most recent of all subdivisions of
geologic time, ranging from the present back to the time (c.11,000 years ago) of
almost complete withdrawal of the glaciers of the preceding Pleistocene epoch.
During the Holocene epoch, the sculpturing of the earth's surface to its present
form was completed.”
“Withdrawal of the glacial ice
resulted in the development of the present-day drainage basins of the Missouri
and Ohio rivers, the development of the Great Lakes, and a global rise in sea
level of up to 100 ft (30 m) as the glacial meltwater was returned to the seas.
Warming climates resulted in the poleward migration of plants and animals.”
“The
most significant development during the Holocene was the rise of modern humans,
who are thought to have first appeared in the late Pleistocene.” Those modern humans did not control
the climate when they arrived on the scene and they do not control it now. They
will never control it no matter how many times Al Gore or the United Nations
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change says so.
We do
not sacrifice virgins, tossing them into volcanoes to ensure a good harvest, nor
do we do rain dances during a drought any more. Some of us, however, are
convinced that we are the first Americans to have ever experienced a drought, a
hurricane, or a blizzard.
When a
magazine like Business Week employs morons to write its news and opinion, there
is no point in subscribing to it in order to have your own intellect reduced by
a couple of IQ points.
I am
thoroughly sick of hearing that all life on the planet is threatened or going
extinct. Been there. Done that.
In his
weekly column on science topics, the Wall Street Journal’s Matt Ridley noted
that, “When the asteroid slammed into the Yucatan Peninsula 66,038,000 years
ago, North America took the brunt of the impact, because the asteroid came in
from the southeast like a golf chip shot.” Globally, it wiped out all the
dinosaurs, along with many bird and other species. Their relatives, the
alligators survived. “Mammals reappeared within 20,000 years in North America,
“probably from Asia via an Arctic land bridge.”
Right
now, countless “environmental” organizations around the world are gearing up to
celebrate “Earth Day” on April 22. Is it just a coincidence that it is the
birthdate of Communist revolutionary and the former Soviet Union’s first
dictator, Vladimir Lenin? I think not.
Business Week, the Economist, Time,
Newsweek and countless other elements of the print and broadcast media will have
an environmental orgasm, spewing forth the tired, old lies that undergird the
greatest hoax of the modern era; one they can no longer call “global warming”
because millions of people have concluded the Earth is getting colder, so now
they call it “climate change.”
The
alleged “consensus” of geoscientists and others that supports the climate change
theory barely exists.
As
reported in the March edition of The Heartland Institute’s Environmental
& Climate News, “Global
warming alarmists are attacking the integrity of scientists, desperately seeking
to minimize the damage presented by a recent survey of geoscientists and
engineers regarding global warming.
“A recent survey of more than 1,000 geoscientists and engineers reported
in the peer-reviewed Organization Studies found that only 36 percent agree with the United Nations
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change assertion that humans are causing a
serious global warming problem. By contrast, a majority of scientists in the
survey believe that nature is the primary cause of recent global warming and/or
that future global warming will not be a very serious problem.”
Should
we trust people, journalists, charged with the responsibility to bring us the
news about economic and scientific topics when they clearly are clueless? I
think not.
© Alan
Caruba, 2013
1 comment:
I sympathize with your annoyance at a business magazine pushing a far left agenda while ignoring scientific facts, but I'll tell you something even worse. A science magazine, "Scientific American has been injecting it's politics into science for the last 30 years.
Integrity in the west? It's gone the way of the Dodo.
Post a Comment