By Alan
Caruba
While everyone welcomes a cease fire
between Hamas in Gaza and the Israelis, no one should expect it to last very
long or that relations between the two will change. In point of fact, the
Israelis struck a bargain with terrorists, not a nation-state.
Reflecting on the cease fire, David
Singer, a lawyer, noted that “The document is not an Agreement, but merely
an Understanding” and that “the parties to the Understanding are not
specifically identified, nor has the document been signed by any parties that
are supposed to be bound by the Understanding.”
At best, the “Palestinian factions” who have the greatest interest in attacking Israel are not a party to the cease fire, nor is al Qaeda or Iran for whom Hamas is a proxy in Gaza as Hezbollah is one in Lebanon.
At best, the “Palestinian factions” who have the greatest interest in attacking Israel are not a party to the cease fire, nor is al Qaeda or Iran for whom Hamas is a proxy in Gaza as Hezbollah is one in Lebanon.
Israel has merely bought some time in
which to determine what it will do next. Time is running out, not just in Gaza,
but with regard to Iran’s nuclear program, deemed by observers to be mere months
from being able to put a nuclear warhead on a missile and send it hurtling
toward Israel to kill millions of its citizens and essentially destroying it as
a viable nation.
If there is any good news out of the
recent conflict, it is that its “iron Dome” defense system against rockets
worked remarkably well. The bad news is that its enemies have learned that it
can be overwhelmed if enough rockets are fired at the same time. Moreover,
Iranian rockets have the capacity to hit Tel Aviv and
Jerusalem.
Daniel Pipes of the Middle East Forum
had some reflections on the Hamas-Israel hostilities, noting that “The old
Arab-Israeli wars were military clashes; the recent ones are political clashes.
The wars of 1948-49, 1967, and 1973 were life-and-death struggles for the Jewish
state. But the wars of 2006, 2008-09, and now 2012 are media events in which
Israeli victory on the military battlefield is foreordained and the struggle is
to win public opinion.”
In the U.S. evangelical Christians
are the largest group of supporters for Israel. Among those with far less
sympathy for Israel are a significant percentage of Democrats and the first term
of the Obama administration made it clear that the President is no friend to
Israel. At one point he called for a return to the 1967 borders and opposed
housing construction in Jerusalem. Dispatching Secretary of State Hillary
Clinton to engineer a cease fire ensured that the U.S. would not be drawn into
the conflict.
Many have expressed surprise that
Egypt would take a significant role as a mediator, but few missed the fact that
the U.S. was in a position to withhold $1.5 billion in foreign aid to Egypt
whose economy is in serious trouble. Mohamed Morsi, Egypt's president has been
traveling far and wide in the Middle East to secure aid, including from the
Saudis, a leader of the Sunni majority of Islam, and always the hidden hand
influencing events in the region, as well as the nation most fearful of the
Shiite nation Iran.
Morsi has been walking the thin edge of a sword and a November 21 New York Times article spelled It out:
Morsi has been walking the thin edge of a sword and a November 21 New York Times article spelled It out:
”Both sides in the conflict appear to be testing Egypt’s new leader.
Hamas, the Islamist Palestinian offshoot of Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood, is
wondering how much support it may draw from its ideological cousins now that
they control the Egyptian state, while Israel’s hawkish leadership seem to probe
the depth of Mr. Morsi’s stated commitment to the peace treaty as
well.”
“For Mr. Morsi, the test is forcing him to reconcile conflicting
elements of his own persona: as the Islamist firebrand who has denounced the
Israelis as ‘vampires’ for killing Palestinian civilians and lauded Hamas for
resisting an illegal occupation, but also as the newly elected president
promising stability, economic revival and friendly relations with Israel’s
Western allies.”
Despite the Times reference to “an illegal occupation”, the fact is that
Israel withdrew from Gaza in a “land for peace” effort that has clearly failed.
Israel does not illegally occupy land that is rooted in the millennia of its
existance.
Dr. Pipes reflected on the timing of Hamas’s ramping up of rocket
attacks on Israel that had been going on for months. He conjectured that the
last attacks were to “test the waters in the aftermath of Barack Obama’s
reelection”, to “rouse public opinion against Israel and make it pay a price
internationally”, “refute accusations by Palestinian Islamic Jihad that it has
abandoned resistance”, and remind the Palestinian Authority, as it seeks
statehood at the United Nations, who controls Gaza.”
The effort of Fatah, based in the West Bank after having been driven out
of Gaza, to secure statehood went nowhere in the U.N. Indeed, the so-called
Palestinians have never had anything but rhetorical support and have been
dependent on a U.N. refugee agency for actual support. They constitute the
oldest unresolved refugee population in the world.
In August 2010, The New York Times reported on a survey by Al Arabiya
television network in which “a staggering 71 percent of the Arabic respondents
have no interest in Palestinian-Israeli peace talks.”
It noted that “For example, it was common knowledge that the May 1948
pan-Arab invasion of the nascent state of Israel was more a scramble for
Palestinian territory than a fight for Palestinian national rights” and that
“from 1948 to 1967, when Egypt and Jordan ruled the Palestinians of the Gaza
Strip and the West Bank, the Arab states failed to put these populations on the
road to statehood.”
So, yes, while it’s a good thing that the rockets are not flying, the
“Iron Dome” proved successful, and the Israeli Air Force was able to kill some
of the militant leadership and degrade its arsenal and ability to proceed to
some degree, the current cease fire is a largely meaningless
“understanding.”
What remains to be understood is the unremitting hostility to Israel
that exists throughout the Middle East and globally where anti-Semitism has
existed for centuries. The Israelis have merely bought some time until the next
attacks.
The wild card remains Israel’s need to attack Iran’s nuclear and
military facilities. Only by inflicting major damage will Israel have any chance
of survival. Long a nuclear nation, Israel must stop Iran from becoming
one.
© Alan Caruba, 2012
No comments:
Post a Comment