The SoCal missile (laughingly referred to as a 'contrail' so as not to panic a clueless public) was NOT the first such incident this year off the coast of North America.
There were two off the coast of Canada (last January), which the Canadian press DID report, not being hindered yet by the 'protect-the-progressive-cause' mentality
that infests American lame-stream media....which dutifully did NOT report the Canadian story.
- The Canadian pictures reflected the same 'dirty burn' mentioned in the below remarks, but no one had the experience to comment on the telemetry/absence of cork-screwing in those firings. Both were subsurface launches, and the Canadian pictures match the ones we have been begrudgingly provided by our Ministry of Truth.
Of course, we must not panic the sheeple so instead slather them with misdirection and B.S. keeping all in a mushroom-like state of complacency.
Having seen incoming Scuds and Silkworms, and outgoing Tomahawks and Exocets, I have to agree with this gentleman's appraisal.
- We have a real problem here, compounded by official coyness (let's hope it is not sheer ineptness, but go figure the odds of THAT in the present state of affairs).
Since the Hillarybeast (also known as Obama-Soetoro's Secretary of State by some, and a flaming Chablis Communist by yours truly) recently gifted the Paleswinians with $150 million of our hard-earned tax dollars, I wonder if they decided to buy (North) Korean to make their missile dollars go further...just like Western drivers buy (South) Korean cars to stretch their dollars?
More On SoCal Missile From A Missile Tech
Monday, 15 November 2010
Missiles plural.......from Rico
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
Too bad our missile expert had to mention the 'fuel cells' on US missiles.
Cheers
This was a contrail. Come on. The comments were made anonymously. He offers no proof of his claims. He may as well have been claiming he saw little green men getting out of UFOs. As doctors say, "When you hear hoofbeats, think horses, not zebras." This means when someone comes in the clinic with a headache, it's probably not brain cancer.
This also means, in this case, that it's horseshit to think that contrail was a Chinese SLBM or the like.
I would refer the individual who wrote that to visit http://contrailscience.com/ but it would not make any difference, because his/her mind is already made up.
I’m also not part of a “clueless public", having worked 37 years evaluating Naval missile performance with two engineering degrees. I have also learned to be skeptical of wild-ass claims.
Deductive reasoning employing "the simplest explanation is always the most accurate" says one thing: It's a CONTRAIL . Period.
BTW USS Charles F Adams was decommissioned in 1990--20 years ago. Extant US Navy STANDARD Missiles are not "beamriders". And ditto to the comment on "fuel cells" above; missiles now employ solid propellants. Furthermore, how is it possible to ascertain that the missile is "foreign made"? I wonder about this person's comments. Don't think all you see on the internet is fact.
Rico's full of it, as is his source.
(Rense? Seriously? Who's "laughable" here? Reptilians.)
Show me these "Canadian pictures" - because there's no link to them, either in the post or at the laughable Rense page.
(Which is convenient, I guess, when one is pushing conspiracy theories. No link makes it really hard to check, especially since then anything someone finds that they think was the thing in question... is easily disposed of as "not the thing I meant".)
A web search finds some shitty pictures that people are saying "looks like a missile to me".
(Of course, those pictures DON'T show flames from the engine, and DO show sun-lit "clouds/smoke"... which is perfectly compatible with "it's another damned contrail, you paranoids".)
There were claims that it was a French launch from France... but the problem there would be that no ballistic missile's engines run that long, and by the time it got to Newfoundland it'd be purely on inertia. So that does NOT explain the "smoke".
As to the US media not reporting the Canadian "missile" story "dutifully"?
News flash, Rico. "Somebody thinks they saw a missile trail in Canada" is not American news. Nobody in the US cares about slow-news-day coverage from Canada. There's no "coverup" there.
Canadian news isn't news in America, short of a coup d'etat or a giant riot.)
And seriously, again, "it's not white and it didn'r corkscrew so it's a large missile launch and not American" - with no argument against it being a contrail, no mention of the pictures of the same "launch" from other angles showing it plainly a contrail?
Bullshit. Purest bullshit.
Either US Air 808 or UPS 902.
But I suppose the pictures from the same time and other angles that show it clearly NOT a missile track don't let one rave on about "sheeple" and North Korea and other unconnected crap.
Seriously, Rico's posts always have a tinge of paranoia to them, but this one's way, way, way off the deep end.
Purest bullshit.
"It was a missile" does not explain the other pictures of the same fucking contrail from other angles that demonstrate that it wasn't a damned missile.
(And some anonymous twat at Rense as a source? Yeah. REPTILIANZ, dude.
If all you have is Rense, that's a sign that you're completely wrong. As Rico is on this. Completely.)
Yes. "it was a contrail" doesn't let you feel all special about knowing about the secret missile conspiracy, or let you rant about North Korea and giant international conspiracies involving Hillary Clinton, but... it sure fits the facts a lot better.
Post a Comment